Brad Hull is a polarizing attorney with strong case outcomes but uneven responsiveness. The bulk of his reviews praise his courtroom diligence, ethical compass, and ability to win difficult matters; families credit him with resolving custody, estate, and real estate disputes when other lawyers saw no path forward. Yet a vocal minority complains he fails to return calls, appears unprepared to meet phone appointments, and bills aggressively for brief interactions. Clients who secure his attention get thorough work; those who cannot reach him feel abandoned.
Based on limited recent reviews, so treat this as low-confidence.
The firm earns strong praise for combining medical expertise with genuine empathy, even declining cases with care. One reviewer noted dismissive handling during a rejection, but the vast majority describe attentive counsel and thorough case work that delivers favorable outcomes.
Established Cleveland firm with standout attorneys like Brad Hull and Jim Aussem earning praise for estate, business, and litigation work. High ratings on completed projects but recurring complaints about billing practices and administrative lapses that have led to lawsuits and debt collection. Results-driven for repeat clients in the right fit; proceed cautiously on billing transparency upfront.
The bar association connects people to lawyers and runs legal clinics, earning praise for respectful staff and a reputation as a leader among major-city bar associations. However, those seeking direct help or low-cost legal aid often find the organization cannot assist them; referrals typically point to paid attorneys, and wait times can stretch weeks with limited follow-up. Best suited for members seeking networking or CLE programs rather than individuals in crisis.
Last updated 2026-08-27